Commission reportedly thought first seven Medjugorje visions were real

| Cindy Wooden | May 17, 2017 | 1 Comment

The commission that now-retired Pope Benedict XVI established to study the alleged apparitions of Mary at Medjugorje, Bosnia-Herzegovina, reportedly voted overwhelmingly to recognize as supernatural the first seven appearances of Mary in 1981.

However, according to a report published by the website Vatican Insider, the commission was much more doubtful about the thousands of alleged visions that have occurred since July 4, 1981, and supposedly continue to this day.

Two of the 17 commission members and consultants thought the alleged visions after the period of June 24-July 3, 1981, were not supernatural, while the other members said it was not possible to make a judgment.

The commission said it was clear that the six alleged visionaries and a seventh who claims to have begun receiving messages from Mary in December 1982 were not given adequate spiritual support.

Vatican Insider published its piece on the report May 16, three days after Pope Francis spoke about some details of the report to journalists traveling with him from Fatima, Portugal.

The Vatican press office May 17 declined to comment on the Vatican Insider piece.

Speaking to journalists May 13, Pope Francis said that, regarding the Medjugorje commission’s work, “three things need to be distinguished.”

“About the first apparitions, when (the ‘seers’) were young, the report more or less says that the investigation needs to continue,” the pope said, according to the English translation posted on the Vatican website.

“Concerning the alleged current apparitions, the report expresses doubts,” he said. Furthermore, “personally, I am more ‘mischievous.’ I prefer Our Lady to be a mother, our mother, and not a telegraph operator who sends out a message every day at a certain time — this is not the mother of Jesus.”

Pope Francis said his “personal opinion” is that “these alleged apparitions have no great value.”

The “real core” of the commission’s report, he said, is “the spiritual fact, the pastoral fact” that thousands of pilgrims go to Medjugorje and are converted. “For this there is no magic wand; this spiritual-pastoral fact cannot be denied.”

The spiritual fruits of the pilgrimages, he said, are the reason why in February he appointed Polish Archbishop Henryk Hoser of Warsaw-Praga to study the best ways to provide pastoral care to townspeople and the pilgrims.

According to Vatican Insider, 13 of the 14 commission members present at one meeting voted to recommend lifting the Vatican ban on official diocesan and parish pilgrimages to Medjugorje.

The commission also recommended turning the town’s parish Church of St. James into a pontifical shrine with Vatican oversight. The move, the commission said, would not signify recognition of the apparitions, but would acknowledge the faith and pastoral needs of the pilgrims while ensuring a proper accounting of the financial donations pilgrims leave.

The commission’s role was to make recommendations to the pope; its report is not an official church judgment on the apparitions. Pope Francis told reporters May 13 that “in the end, something will be said,” but he gave no timeline.

Tags:

Category: U.S. & World News

  • Paula Ruddy

    I’d be interested to know how the Catholic Spirit editorial staff thinks about headlines. Are they supposed to capture the gist of the story? Are they supposed to appeal to the majority of readers? I took the head and the subhead on this article to be appealing to the majority of readers, my presumption being that most readers of the CS want Mary’s transmissions at Medjugorje to be coming directly from her. Am I right in my presumption about CS readers? Was the headline supposed to appeal to them? Were they pleased when they read the article? Or did they get riled at Pope Francis for his evaluation of the situation?

    The gist of the article to me was that people who believe that Mary is speaking directly at Medjugorje and who go there in pilgrimage have spiritual experiences, but the Vatican is not going to say yet that Mary is transmitting directly. Pope Francis thinks of Mary differently from those believers; however he also thinks the pilgrims to Poland and the townspeople should receive more support. The means for support has not been figured out yet, and there are arguments for the solution’s being handled locally and also for its being handled by the Vatican by taking over. Seems that the money contributed and what happens to it is a story in itself (last line).