2,400 faith leaders ask Senate to nix tax cut legislation

| November 30, 2017 | 2 Comments
The Senate preparing to vote in December on tax cut legislation

U.S. Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., speak Nov. 28 after the Senate Budget Committee voted on the markup of fiscal year 2018 budget reconciliation bill on Capitol Hill in Washington. The Senate also was preparing to vote in December on tax cut legislation, which 2,400 religious leaders called “fiscally irresponsible.” CNS photo/Joshua Roberts, Reuters

More than 2,400 religious faith leaders, including hundreds of Catholic women religious and dozens of priests, asked the U.S. Senate to vote down tax cut legislation.

In a Nov. 29 letter to senators, the leaders called the bill “fiscally irresponsible” and said that it “endangers our country’s economic health.” The letter added that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act “disproportionately benefits the wealthy at the expense of vulnerable people and low-income families.”

The letter expressed concern that the legislation, with its complexity, was “being recklessly rushed through Congress” without enough time for review by voters.

The correspondence was sent under the auspices of the Interreligious Working Group on Domestic Human Needs and the Interfaith Healthcare Coalition. It was addressed to Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, and Sen. Charles Schumer, D-New York, Senate majority and minority leaders, respectively.

“As people of faith, we view decisions about tax policy and the federal budget as moral decisions. Simply put, this proposed legislation is fundamentally unjust. If it becomes law, it will result in harmful consequences for those most needing support so as to the benefit of high-income earners and big corporations,” the letter said.

Citing findings by the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation, the faith leaders expressed concern with the bill’s provisions to roll back cuts for low-income earners beginning in 2021, saying that by 2027, they would see a 25 percent tax hike. The bill calls for tax cuts to remain in place for upper-income earners.

The letter pointed to the bill’s repeal of the individual mandate under the Affordable Care Act as a concern, saying that it would cause “catastrophic losses in health coverage.”

Other apprehensions raised by the signers include the estimated $1.5 trillion growth in the country’s debt over the next decade because of lost revenues and that they feared spending on social services for poor and vulnerable people would be reduced to compensate.

The letter’s final point addressed the negative effect of the legislation on charitable giving. The signers contend that because tax filers would be less likely to itemize taxes under new rules, fewer people would benefit from making charitable donations.

Among Catholic signers were Sister Simone Campbell, a Sister of Social Service and executive director of the Catholic social justice lobby Network; Sister Helen Prejean, a member of the Congregation of St. Joseph; retired Auxiliary Bishop Thomas Gumbleton of Detroit; Patrick Carolan, executive director, Franciscan Action Network; and Lawrence Couch, director, National Advocacy Center of the Sisters of the Good Shepherd.

The letter was released a week after Bishop Frank Dewane of Venice, Florida, chairman of the U.S. bishops’ Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, called some provisions of the bill “fundamentally flawed” in a letter to senators.

While supporting some sections of the bill, he urged the rewriting of provisions that “will raise income taxes on the working poor while simultaneously providing a large tax cut to the wealthy.”

Tags: , , ,

Category: U.S. & World News

  • Charles C.

    Just a couple of quick points out of the several which could be made about this letter.

    “The letter pointed to the bill’s repeal of the individual mandate under
    the Affordable Care Act as a concern, saying that it would cause ‘catastrophic losses in health coverage.’ ”

    Don’t these “leaders” know what the word “mandate” means? Repealing the mandate simply means that people will become free to decide for themselves whether to buy insurance. If some decide not to buy it, perhaps because it’s too expensive or any other reason, how is that a loss? They haven’t lost anything, they can still buy it if they want to, the coverage is still available, they’re just not being forced to buy it.

    If someone decides not to buy a home, is that a catastrophic loss in home ownership? If the “leaders” are going to try this silly, partisan talking point argument, why pay attention to anything else in the letter?

    And who is listed as “faith leaders?” Campbell, Prejean, and Gumbleton? The letter loses credibility by having them sign it.

    If “faith leaders” want to be ignored as just another extreme pressure group issuing cut and paste press releases they’re doing a fine job.

    • Well said. Once again certain church “leaders” have exhibited ignorance when it comes to basic economic principles.