Overdoses, violence and God-talk

| October 23, 2017 | 2 Comments

Our society is failing to get to the bottom of the issues. We spend our energy trying to treat the symptoms of social crises, while either ignoring or remaining in denial about the deeper problems in today’s world, which exist first and foremost within the human heart.

Mass shootings, suicides, drug addiction — the litany of crises goes on. We hear about them all the time. Conferences, rallies and awareness campaigns sprout up at every turn as we seek solutions and meaningful change. But unless we address these problems with an eye to the whole of the human person — a union of body and soul made for relationship with God and others — that change will not come.

For example, a recent column in MinnPost’s Health section cited statistics from the Minnesota Department of Health showing that drug and alcohol-related mortality and suicide are on the rise. This disturbing trend is attributed to an increase in “diseases of despair,” meaning Minnesotans are suffering from an increasing lack of hope, with grave consequences.

The author of the article identifies unemployment, income inequality and lack of opportunity as the main sources of this hopelessness. The implied solution, therefore, is to intervene in some way to change these socioeconomic conditions, which have fomented widespread despair.

If people are more economically secure and have more opportunities, the thought goes, their sense of hopelessness will disappear. Although unemployment or opportunity gaps certainly have some explanatory value in this case, the overall approach of the article is a striking example of what Pope Francis calls the “technocratic paradigm” in action.

In his most recent encyclical, “Laudato Si’,” Pope Francis describes the technocratic paradigm as “the tendency, at times unconscious, to make the method and aims of science and technology an epistemological paradigm which shapes the lives of individuals and the workings of society.”

A technocratic approach to social crises, then, is one which reduces them to considerations of science — social or hard sciences — and technology alone.

Put another way, it’s an instance of reducing a complex human problem to simple economics. Hopelessness can allegedly be engineered out of society, if we create the right program or implement the right policy. Even the term “diseases of despair” is telling. Despair is now considered a disease, and a disease can be treated, for example, by the state health department.

Of course, we ought to address the difficult problems of mass shootings, substance abuse and suicide, and use all of our means to combat them. Yet, though this sort of action is necessary, it is not sufficient. It fails to speak to the whole of the human person, which is why we continue to struggle with solutions.

Despair is not like the flu; it reaches deep into the human soul. For this reason, Pope Francis calls technocratic solutions one-dimensional; they address only one aspect of the human person, and often overlook the most important human realities.

Is it any wonder that in an increasingly secular society people do not know for whom or what they are made? Without such knowledge, they develop psychoses, or chase things to fill the God-sized hole in their heart, falling into behaviors that are destructive or that lead them into despair.

As Pope Francis puts it: “When human beings fail to find their true place in this world, they misunderstand themselves and end up acting against themselves.”

Therefore, we cannot stop at the level of the specifically scientific when it comes to social crises. We must look deeper to the root causes, which lie at the heart of what it means to be human.

It is our duty as Christians to remind people — all people, regardless of belief — that they are made for loving relationships, with God and with others.

Such “God talk” is not inconsistent with a commitment to pluralism or respecting others. It’s instead a reminder to all people about the reality of who the human person is: created by God, body and soul, which, as the ancients and our nation’s founders could attest, is a truth that can be known by reason outside the light of faith.

Unless we propose an integrated vision of the person, we will be unable to address fully all of the causes of the social crises around us.

Adkins is executive director of the Minnesota Catholic Conference.

Support the Federal Disaster Assistance Nonprofit Fairness Act

In the aftermath of a natural disaster, houses of worship often play an irreplaceable role in the recovery of a community. Discrimination that treats houses of worship as ineligible for federal assistance in the wake of a natural disaster hurts the very communities most affected by the indiscriminate force of nature.

The Federal Disaster Assistance Nonprofit Fairness Act of 2017 (H.R. 2405/ S.1823) will ensure that churches, synagogues, mosques and other houses of worship damaged in Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, as well as in future disasters, will be eligible for federal financial aid to repair their damaged buildings on the same terms as other, similarly eligible nonprofits that receive aid from FEMA.

The Federal Disaster Assistance Nonprofit Fairness Act does not ask for special treatment, just equal treatment that conforms to constitutional protections.

Call Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Sen. Al Franken today and ask them to support S.1823.

Sen. Klobuchar: 1-888-224-9043

Sen. Franken: 651-221-1016

Tags: , , , , , ,

Category: Faith in the Public Arena

  • Paula Ruddy

    “our society is failing…” Jason Adkins continues the incessant and obvious critique that Catholic preachers make. At the end he says Christians have a duty to remind people that they are made for loving relationships with God and others. To remind people, doesn’t our Catholic culture have to demonstrate or model that consciousness of God? Scolding “secularized” society doesn’t do it. Do the MCC’s policy positions demonstrate loving relationship? Consider the policy of opposing the Minnesota Department of Education’s efforts to stop LGBT bullying in schools. Is it Church or State that shows more respect for the human person?

    • Charles C.

      I frequently have some criticism of Mr. Adkins, although I often agree with him in part.

      This time I have nothing but praise for him. Well done, refocusing us on
      the real problems. We are citizens of another world, first of all we must be good citizens of God’s kingdom and encourage others to be. Then we must be good citizens of our “State” which might be a city, state or country. “Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s and unto God the things that are God’s.” We are called to both duties.

      You may be misinterpreting the effects and principles of the legislation you cites, as well as the reason the Church opposed it. It is certainly not just a matter of saying there should be no LGBT bullying in schools, and the Church replying that there should be.

      I am surprised that she asks whether the Church or State shows more respect for the human person. Consider the cases in history where the State was strong. Did that result in more respect for the individual? Of course it didn’t.

      Islam and China alone account for three billion people (out of 7.6 billion). Neither is Christian and neither holds the individual in any esteem. If you’re concerned about Gay rights, compare either of those with the US.

      The State is only concerned with the State. The individual doesn’t matter. Even groups of individuals don’t matter unless they can do something for the State.

      I’ll pick the Church every time.