Combating racial disparities

| Jason Adkins | September 26, 2017 | 2 Comments

Racial disparities continue to persist in American life. As a response, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops recently instituted a new initiative to fight racism in all its forms.

Though racism — irrational animus toward others based on their skin color, ethnicity or race — is a sin within the human heart and cannot be fully eradicated by public policy, we can work in the public arena to mitigate its effects.

Combating racial disparities will require overcoming policies championed by both the political right and left that entrench established ideological and economic power structures. In other words, it requires the wisdom of Catholic social teaching.

The effects of racism can be measured in many ways, but one way to look at them is the degree to which African-Americans and other persons of color are excluded from social, economic and political participation in American life.

The possibility of participation in the economy, in cultural life and in politics is, according to the Church’s social doctrine, a necessary condition for human flourishing. As the Catechism of the Catholic Church states, “The equality of men rests essentially on their dignity as persons and the rights that flow from it: Every form of social or cultural discrimination in fundamental personal rights on the grounds of sex, race, color, social conditions, language or religion must be curbed and eradicated as incompatible with God’s design.”

Fostering racial justice

Laws remain on the books that, while not necessarily discriminatory on their face, disproportionately affect persons of color.

The policies that exacerbate racial disparities and deny social participation are found primarily, though not exclusively, in three areas: education, criminal justice and the family.

For example, too many children of color are trapped in underperforming schools and, as a result, there is a significant achievement gap between white students and students of color, particularly African-American and Latino students.

As education is the great ladder of opportunity, denying children the right to a good education puts a significant barrier in their path to social, cultural, political and economic participation.

Kids need a lifeline, and giving families greater choice in education is a top civil rights imperative.

Similarly, kids trapped in failing schools and who lack hope often turn to a life of crime, which is known today as the school-to-prison pipeline. And because of overly punitive sentencing policies that helped politicians win elections, we’ve imprisoned many non-violent people unnecessarily, particularly African-American men, when what they really needed was treatment, counseling or a job.

Putting more people in prison will certainly limit crime in the short term, but not without other long-term costs.

Fortunately, public officials on both sides of the aisle now recognize these costs, and Minnesota has led the way in criminal justice reform during the past few years, enacting policies such as “ban the box” and drug sentencing reform.

But more can be done, such as reconsidering the length of probation sentences imposed on offenders who have shown good character, as well as identifying ways to eliminate the collateral consequences of a conviction that impede access to education, employment and housing.

Imprisoning large numbers of African-American men during their prime education and earning years has severely harmed their long-term economic prospects, as well as their ability to marry and form families. Many of these men are considered unmarriageable and, as a result, 70 percent of African-American children are born out of wedlock to women who are often not even partnered, let alone married.

A major difference in the percentage of white and black children born to married parents (64 to 30) is perhaps the most significant cause of racial disparities, and one that creates a cycle of poverty and exclusion that leads back to the school-to-prison pipeline.

According to the Institute for Family Studies, “Black children in the United States enjoy less family stability than white children, experiencing close to twice as many family transitions — union dissolutions and partnership formations — as white children. Family instability is associated with a host of negative outcomes ranging from asthma to obesity, and from teen pregnancy to substance abuse. It is also negatively linked with fundamental predictors of success in adult life like educational attainment. For these reasons, black children’s family instability is an important part of the U.S. stratification story.”

Similarly, welfare reform was meant to encourage marriage and foster family stability, but it is often structured in ways that do not encourage marriage, and sometimes even discourage it. That needs to change.

The data are in: Family structure matters to child well-being, and a kid needs both his or her mother and father to play an active role in his or her life.

To be sure, combating racial disparities is a complex and challenging problem. Other issues, such as discrimination in employment and housing, and the creation of barriers to economic mobility by the monopolistic behavior of businesses and industries, also play a role.

But to decrease the reality of an economy of exclusion and foster greater social participation by minorities and persons of color, education, criminal justice and marriage are important places to start.

Adkins is executive director of the Minnesota Catholic Conference.

Ask Congress to protect young people from unnecessary deportations

Ask Minnesota lawmakers to co-sponsor the Dream Act of 2017

The Dream Act of 2017, S. 1615 and H.R. 3440, was recently introduced in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. It is intended to protect immigrant youth who entered the United States as children and know America as their only home. Many of the estimated 780,000 individuals this bill would protect are contributors to our economy, veterans of our military, and leaders in our parishes and communities. The bill would offer qualifying immigrant youth “conditional permanent resident status” and a path to full, lawful and permanent residency and eventual citizenship.

As Catholics, we have long supported “Dreamers” as we believe in protecting the dignity of every human being, especially our children. The legislation helps prioritize border enforcement resources toward those who actually present a danger to our communities.

Call your representatives in Congress and ask them to co-sponsor and support the Dream Act of 2017. Find their contact information under ”Take Action” at
http://www.mncatholic.org.

Save

Tags:

Category: Faith in the Public Arena

  • Charles C.

    I’m reasonably sure that it wasn’t Mr. Adkins intent, but he has launched a deadly attack against Blacks. It has been repeated by multitudes of other opinion leaders and politicians, and pretty much guarantees the failure of Blacks in this country if they take the message to heart.

    The message? “Racial disparities” arise from, and can only be resolved by eliminating, racism.

    First, it is an illogical statement. Three-quarters of NBA players are Black. Sixty-eight percent of NFL players are Black. These are racial disparities and they are not caused by racism.

    In 1948, the unemployment rate for Black 16 -17 year-olds was 9.4% and for Whites of the same age it was 10.2%. in 2016 for Whites it was 18.3% and for Blacks of that age, 36.1%. Was there no racism in 1948, but there’s a ton of it now?

    In 1960, 22% of Black children were raised by a single parent. In 2008, 62% of Black children grew up with one or no parent. For Whites, it’s 19%. Is this disparity caused by an increase in racism since 1948?

    Twice as many Asians as Whites get into New York’s three selective high schools. Is that “racial disparity” the result of discrimination against Whites?

    Ghetto riots, which erupted in the 1960’s were far less common in the South where there was more poverty and discrimination.

    “The most deadly ghetto riot of the 1960s occurred in Detroit, where 43 people were killed — 33 of whom were black. In Detroit at that time, black median family income was 95 percent of white median family income. The unemployment rate among blacks was 3.4 percent and black home ownership was higher in Detroit than in any other major city.” (T. Sowell) So, what racism in income, employment, or housing led to the Detroit riots?

    “Only 39 percent of all students in New York state schools who were tested recently scored at the “proficient” level in math, but 100 percent of the students at the Crown Heights Success Academy school scored at that level in math. Blacks and Hispanics are 90 percent of the students in the Crown Heights Success Academy.” Are the success Academies free from racism while the rest of New York is filled with racist schools?

    “More than 40 years ago, my own research turned up statistics on black and white professors who had Ph.D.s from equally high-ranked institutions in the same fields, and who had published the same number of articles. When all these things were held constant, the black professors earned somewhat more than white professors.” No racism there, apparently.

    In summary:

    “If there were a contest for the most stupid idea in politics, my choice would be the assumption that people would be evenly or randomly distributed in incomes, institutions, occupations or awards, in the absence of somebody doing somebody wrong.

    “Political crusades, bureaucratic empires and lucrative personal careers as grievance mongers have been built on the foundation of that assumption, which is almost never tested against any facts.” (T. Sowell)

    But by believing the idea presented by Mr. Adkins and others, Blacks are told that they will not succeed, their failure is due to other peoples’ racism, and there is nothing they can do about it (except maybe riot and destroy things, or act up at school).

    Accepting that belief will cause more damage than the Klan did.

  • No Logic

    “Laws remain on the books that, while not necessarily discriminatory on their face, disproportionately affect persons of color.”

    “Putting more people in prison will certainly limit crime in the short term, but not without other long-term costs.”

    In other words, and as quoted by a speaker from North Minneapolis, ‘we need to turn a blind eye to some behaviors’. How are no,consequences for one’s choice of behavior – or consequences to only white males – gooing to make the nation a better place?